POLITICS

Bucking House GOP, Murkowski backs Planned Parenthood

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) walks through the hall of the U.S. Capitol. Murkowski opposes the cuts to Planned Parenthood proposed in house House spending bill.

Updated: March 12, 2011 | 11:12 a.m.
March 12, 2011 | 10:43 a.m.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, has asked top Senate appropriators to continue providing funding for Planned Parenthood, making her the first GOP senator to publicly oppose funding cuts to the organization that House Republicans want to make.

A House-passed continuing resolution to fund the government for the rest of the fiscal year would eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood. The funding bill did not receive enough votes in the Senate this week to pass. But there are efforts by some conservative lawmakers and groups to include the funding cut in any spending bill that moves forward.

“I believe that Planned Parenthood provides vital services to those in need and disagree with their funding cuts contained in the bill,” Murkowski wrote in a letter to Senate Appropriations Chairman Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, and ranking member Thad Cochran.

Murkowski voted for the funding bill, but said in her letter that she only did so “to send a clear signal” that she is serious about reducing the nation’s deficit. She said she supports several programs facing the chopping block in the bill, and asked that those cuts not be made.

Along with Planned Parenthood, she cited her support for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program; the Strengthening Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving Institutions Program; and the Weatherization Assistance Program.

“I ask that you consider these programs going forward to determine if there is room for allowing continued funding,” she wrote to Inouye and Cochran. “By zeroing out certain programs, some entities will be forced to close their doors because of how reliant they are on the federal government.”

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Leave a Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
National Journal Email Alerts

Stay ahead of the curve with these alerts.
Learn more.

Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

Boom and Bust: Renewable Energy's Future?

4:03 p.m.

Latest Response by Jacqueline Savitz: Give Offshore Wind a Chance to Boom

Energy Experts

Boom and Bust: Renewable Energy's Future?

4:02 p.m.

Latest Response by Jacqueline Savitz: Give Offshore Wind a Chance to Boom

Energy Experts

Boom and Bust: Renewable Energy's Future?

12:56 p.m.

Latest Response by Richard L. Kauffman: Two Principles For Clean-Energy Policy

More Expert Opinions »