Play of the Day! 5/18/12
Play of the Day!
Biden's Campaign Slogan
Barack Obama
National Security
Obama vs. Romney
Chicago Skyline
NATIONAL SECURITY
Cities and Summits
Hispanic map
The Next America
Hispanic Population Growth
CONGRESS

Top Aides Used to Lure Donor Dollars

Updated: January 18, 2012 | 11:54 a.m.
January 17, 2012 | 9:45 p.m.

In the race for 2012 campaign cash, congressional Democrats and Republicans are using a controversial tactic to solicit big donors: selling access to top staff in Congress.

Lawmakers have long given their time to lobbyists and contributors in exchange for campaign checks. Increasingly, their aides are offering themselves up for money, as well.

An invitation to a February fundraiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee promises, in bold face, that the chiefs of staff to six lawmakers will attend. The names of the staffers, each of whom is an aide to a member of the business-friendly New Democrat Coalition, appear larger than those of their bosses. Donors are asked to spend up to $15,000 to attend the reception and dinner.

Meanwhile, the political arm of House Republicans, the National Republican Campaign Committee, is promising its biggest donors in 2012—those interest groups that give the legal maximum of $15,000 this year—tickets to two “chiefs of staff receptions.” In addition, those top contributors will also be invited to quarterly luncheons that feature “Republican Party leaders and key staff.”

Meredith McGehee, policy director at the Campaign Legal Center, a public-interest group, said the selling of face time with staff—“influence-buying at its worst,” she called it—is the unseemly new normal in Washington.

“It becomes more brazen every year,” McGehee said of the linkage between access to staff and money. “Something that was once considered both a violation of ethics and in bad taste—now it is pretty commonplace.”

Legally, congressional aides are allowed to work on their members’ campaigns—and even solicit campaign contributions—so long as it is outside of the Capitol, does not use federal resources, and is not done during formal work hours.

Jesse Ferguson, a spokesman for the DCCC, defended the February event. “Both parties do these types of fundraisers, and we appreciate everything these staff members are doing to help win a Democratic majority,” he said, noting the staffers were volunteering their time.

The NRCC did not return calls for comment.

The trend of congressional aides headlining political fundraisers is not entirely new. All four of the political campaign arms in Congress have offered contact with aides of lawmakers in recent years to loosen lobbyists’ wallets.

In 2011, for instance, Senate Democrats held a “Friends of the Hill” dinner for donors who made a suggested contribution of $10,000. Among those advertised to be in attendance was David Krone, chief of staff to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

But Bill Allison, editorial director for the Sunlight Foundation, which collects and publishes congressional fundraising invitations, said advertising staff attendance is still “somewhat unusual,” though growing more common.
The problem, Allison said, is that after attending such an event, top congressional aides know clearly who big contributors are and “will probably be more sensitive to the contributors’ issues than to the general public.”

For the Democrats’ fundraiser this February, the aide listed atop the invitation is Kate Winkler, chief of staff to Rep. Joseph Crowley, D-N.Y., who chairs the New Democrat Coalition. Crowley was among a group of lawmakers investigated by the House Ethics Committee in 2010 and 2011 for the “appearance that special treatment or access was provided to campaign donors” during the drafting of the legislation overhauling the financial industry. Winkler was interviewed as part of the probe.

Crowley was ultimately cleared in the case. Documents released after the inquiry was complete showed Crowley’s fundraising consultant offered to set up coffee dates between donors and the congressman. Winkler did not respond to an e-mail asking for comment on Tuesday, nor did any of the other featured aides in next month’s DCCC event.

This article appeared in the Wednesday, January 18, 2012 edition of National Journal Daily.

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Play of the Day! 5/18/12
Play of the Day!
Biden's Campaign Slogan
Barack Obama
National Security
Obama vs. Romney
Chicago Skyline
NATIONAL SECURITY
Cities and Summits
Hispanic map
The Next America
Hispanic Population Growth
Leave a Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad

The National Journal Big 10 is our look at the most pivotal Senate races. We'll be checking in with them throughout the campaign. Read the latest.

Columns
Matthew Dowd: Common Sense

What Palin Can Teach Obama About Seizing the Moment

May 17, 2012
The president could learn from her well-honed habit of following her gut instincts.
Charlie Cook: Charlie Cook's The Cook Report

The Folly of Crowds

May 17, 2012
Not all opinions are created equal. If you’re a political prognosticator, you learn which ones you can ignore.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Win One, Lose One

May 17, 2012
Why the Left has succeeded more in advancing social causes than in promoting its economic priorities.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Health Care Experts

What Can Congress Learn from the FDA User Fee Bills?

May 18, 2012

Latest Response by Meghan McCarthy: Sen. Bennet: Model for Congress

Energy Experts

Boom and Bust: Renewable Energy's Future?

May 17, 2012

Latest Response by Matthew Haskins: Underlying Trends and Renewables

Education Experts

Considering Government-Funded Tuition

May 17, 2012

Latest Response by Paul Combe: 2 Years of Public College Should Be Free

More Expert Opinions »