NATIONAL SECURITY

U.S. Vows Full Investigation into Attack on Pakistan-Afghanistan Border

Updated: November 27, 2011 | 10:47 a.m.
November 26, 2011 | 9:29 p.m.
K.M.Chaudary/AP

Pakistani protesters shout slogans against America and NATO in Lahore, Pakistan on Saturday. Pakistan on Saturday accused NATO helicopters and fighter jets of firing on two army checkpoints in the country's northwest and killing 24 soldiers.

The U.S. vows to conduct a full investigation into a NATO attack that allegedly killed 24 Pakistani troops at two checkpoints near the Afghanistan border.

In a joint statement Saturday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta offered their condolences for the loss of life and support NATO's immediate investigation.

Earlier Saturday, Pakistan demanded that the U.S. vacate a suspected drone base within 15 days, the Associated Press reports. The demand comes as the Pakistani government is claiming a NATO attack.

The base, Shamsi Air Base, is located in southwestern Baluchistan province.

Pakistan also closed both border crossings with Afghanistan, effectively halting the path of NATO supply trucks into the country.

In a statement, the White House expressed condolences, as well as "our desire to work together to determine what took place, and our commitment to the U.S.-Pakistan partnership which advances our shared interests, including fighting terrorism in the region."

Atlantic Wire

Latest Politics Posts:
Loading feed...

Details of the attack are still sketchy, but the Pakistan government is saying that the attacks were unprovoked, a sentiment that wasn't dispelled by an unnamed Western diplomat who spoke to CBS News. "We don't know the full details yet," the diplomat said. "But it's possible the attack may have mistakenly targeted Pakistani soldiers on the assumption that they were militants."

NATO has said that they are investigating the incident which occurred just before dawn. Insurgents based across the Pakistan border are responsible for much of the violence in Afghanistan, but NATO forces are not allowed to cross over to attack them.

Regardless of how events unfolded, the incident will only further strain already fraught relations between Pakistan and Western forces. "How can anyone expect a regime in Islamabad to be giving more support to the U.S. when our soldiers are being killed in cold blood?" a senior Pakistan foreign ministry official asked CBS News.

The attacks come nearly a year after two Pakistani were killed after being mistaken for insurgents by a U.S. helicopter.

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Leave a Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
Columns
Gwen Ifill: Gwen's Take

History's Romance: Why Politics Past Beats Politics Present

5:45 p.m.

Is it just my imagination, or have politics and politicians grown smaller?

Matthew Dowd: Common Sense

What Palin Can Teach Obama About Seizing the Moment

May 17, 2012
The president could learn from her well-honed habit of following her gut instincts.
Charlie Cook: Charlie Cook's The Cook Report

The Folly of Crowds

May 17, 2012
Not all opinions are created equal. If you’re a political prognosticator, you learn which ones you can ignore.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

34 minutes ago

Latest Response by Tim Peckinpaugh: The Pentagon: A Leader on Clean Energy

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

3:51 p.m.

Latest Response by Benjamin Lowe: Clean Energy Critical to Security

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

2:41 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Military Should Use More Natural Gas

More Expert Opinions »