ANALYSIS

What a Week: Afghan Deaths, S&P, and Debt Limit Debate Challenge Obama

Updated: August 6, 2011 | 1:22 p.m.
August 6, 2011 | 1:13 p.m.
Pete Souza/The White House

President Barack Obama holds a conference call from Camp David during a briefing on the tragedy in Afghanistan with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, National Security Advisor Tom Donilon, and Chief of Staff Bill Daley, on Saturday.

The downing of a NATO Chinook helicopter and the deaths of at least 31 Americans, the single deadliest day for the United States in Afghanistan, provide a tragic coda to what may be a seminal moment in the Obama presidency.

Should Obama lose reelection, this week might one day be considered an inflection point. 

First, the White House and Congress failed to reach a “grand bargain” on deficit reduction while barely meeting a self-imposed deadline to lift the nation’s debt limit. The bitter negotiations damaged the standing of Washington leaders—including Obama—in the eyes of an anxious and frustrated public.

Then a rating agency lowered the U.S. credit rating for the first time, an ignominious legacy for Obama.

From National Journal:
Meet the 2012 GOP Contenders


Cook Report: Whole Foods v. Cracker Barrel

PICTURES: Who Might Be Named to the Super Committee

6 Ways to Get America Back to Work

PICTURES: Obama Grabs Some Burgers

And now this harrowing news from Afghanistan—a sobering  reminder that a war Obama inherited and expanded will not end anytime soon.

It has been only 96 days since a triumphant Obama informed the nation that a high-risk operation to kill Osama bin Laden had succeeded. As the president’s approval numbers ticked up, the operation—and the widely praised way that Obama conducted it—seemed a sure payoff when he runs for reelection.

The three months since have been rough ones for the administration.

Only 14 days after that speech, the United States, on May 16, reached the legal debt limit of $14.3 trillion, triggering an ugly political battle. That deal averted an historic default, giving the president what he said he wanted for his 50th birthday on Thursday. But there was another “gift” on his birthday—a really bad day in the stock market, one bad enough to wipe out $2 trillion in wealth and erase all the gains of the year.

And when he tried to get away from Washington for a quiet weekend at Camp David to recharge his batteries, the bad news followed him. There was Friday night’s news that Standard & Poor’s, one of the major ratings agencies, had downgraded the U.S. credit rating for the first time. Standard & Poor’s ignored furious behind-the-scenes lobbying by the administration and left no doubt that it was disgusted by what it called “political brinkmanship” in Washington.

What a week. What a 100 days. The only good news for the president politically is that Election Day is still more than a year away and that voters are even more down on the Republicans in Congress. The GOP insisted on taking the country to the brink, all but daring the ratings agencies to strip the country of its coveted AAA rating.

It would trivialize the deaths of the brave Americans who perished on that Chinook to seek political meaning in their sacrifice. In his statement issued from Camp David, the president kept the focus on them, calling the deaths “a reminder of the extraordinary sacrifices made by the men and women of our military and their families.”

But it is neither inappropriate nor untimely to note that the president’s response to this tragedy—and this week of setbacks—will matter both to the country and to his political hopes. President Ronald Reagan faced a similar challenge on a far bloodier day. Against the advice of many military experts, Reagan had inserted a large Marine presence in Lebanon’s civil war. The result, on October 23, 1983, was a lethal terrorist attack that left 241 American troops dead. Reagan responded by altering his timetable and his strategy and had pulled all U.S. Marines out of Lebanon less than four months after the attack.

In the wake of Saturday’s attack, Obama will face similar pressure to alter his timetable and accelerate the American withdrawal from Afghanistan.

The pressure won’t stop there.

The White House must find a way to recast his political course, from war policy to economic policy, from leadership style to negotiating tactics. How he responds will send important signals to the electorate as they weigh his request for a second term. 

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Leave a Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

The Emerging Democratic Divide

9:30 p.m.
The brouhaha over a moderate New Jersey mayor’s comments has aggravated tensions that have been growing within the party’s coalition.
Charlie Cook: Charlie Cook's Off to the Races

If It Hits the Fan

May 21, 2012
Europe’s economy is in a tailspin and China’s is slowing. Our political system is a mess. Who are voters going to blame if it all goes bad? Not just Obama.
Gwen Ifill: Gwen's Take

History's Romance: Why Politics Past Beats Politics Present

May 21, 2012

Is it just my imagination, or have politics and politicians grown smaller?

More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

34 minutes ago

Latest Response by Tom Buis: American Families Need American Fuel

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

10:35 a.m.

Latest Response by Keith Crane: DoD Renewable Fuels Investment Premature

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

9:40 a.m.

Latest Response by Kathleen Sgamma: Access to American Oil Provides Security

More Expert Opinions »